Peer Review Policy

The Journal of Medical Advances (JOMA) employs a thorough and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research. Our Peer Review Policy is designed to uphold high standards of academic rigor while fostering constructive dialogue among authors, reviewers, and editors.

Upon submission, each manuscript is assigned to an editorial team that evaluates its suitability for the journal. If deemed appropriate, the manuscript undergoes double-blind peer review, where both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous. This process promotes impartiality and reduces bias in the evaluation of research. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field, ensuring that each manuscript is reviewed by knowledgeable professionals.

Reviewers are expected to provide objective and constructive feedback, identifying strengths and weaknesses in the research while suggesting improvements. The editorial team carefully considers reviewer comments and recommendations before making publication decisions. Authors are provided with the opportunity to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewer feedback, promoting collaboration and enhancing the quality of the final published work.

We value the contributions of our reviewers and recognize their critical role in maintaining the standards of our journal. As a token of appreciation, we acknowledge reviewers on our website and offer opportunities for professional development. JOMA is dedicated to fostering a positive peer review experience for both authors and reviewers, ultimately contributing to the advancement of medical research.